On Dec 8, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Kem Tekinay wrote:
On 12/8/06 4:19 PM, Alberto Paderno at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
irst because the purpose was to compare the
execution speed of two different programming languages (and it
would not be
nice to do that by calling the first programming language from the
second)
Exactly. Well put.
Take it for what it was - a away to get perl performance in RB. I
never claimed that it made RB faster, just that the summary
application would provide the simplicity of an RB GUI wrapped around
a PERL-fast script.
I'm terribly sorry that I wasted the NUG bandwidth discussing RB's
flexibility...
Tim
--
Tim Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
