On 12/9/06 10:56 AM, Ronald Vogelaar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I did. I still don't see the point of intentionally comparing the > strongest part of one language against the weakest of another [and then > being surprised about the outcome].
Now you've lost me. The code you quoted was the first of two versions that concatenated strings. The point of it was to see which could do that small concatenation faster and, even though the strings were the same, it was to test the case of when the strings themselves were unknown. In light of that, I don't understand your comment. __________________________________________________________________________ Kem Tekinay (212) 201-1465 MacTechnologies Consulting Fax (914) 242-7294 http://www.mactechnologies.com Pager (917) 491-5546 To join the MacTechnologies Consulting mailing list, send an e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
