In general I'd agree with Trausti, but one thing to consider is that XP, since service pack two, only allows 10 tcp connections at a time, unless someone has applied a 3rd party patch, like Lvllord's, and even then that limit is re-imposed with most of the security updates that come from Windows updates. I don't know what behavior this could cause, since, last I looked, it wasn't a very well documented behavior. However, on the anecdotal side, a client of mine (I do freelance computer and network support/design) switched his workstations to XP from 98 and was losing connections to printers. He has 6 printers, and anytime the tcp limit was reached, one or more of the printers would be taken offline and you'd have to re-establish the connection manually. Anyway, simply because of this, I'd suggest using a more dynamic connect->payload->disconnect sort of approach.

Good luck,
Fargo

Tim James wrote:
I have a Rb2006/r4 Valentina v2 app that has to service up to 100 individual IP connections relatively infrequently (every 3 mins or so) but in peak selling times every 30 seconds. The client is also in Rb/V2.

In terms of the design employed in both the server and the client, which is better both in terms of server processing load and reliability of the connection.

1. Have all clients establish a connection and leave it sitting there all day ready for use, or connect/disconnect to/from the socket each time access is needed to the server.

My concern is taking the wrong approach before I can network test the full load of clients on the server

(Hardware currently is clients Win Xp, Server Apple X Serve)


TIA

Happy Holidays to All


Tim
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to