I agree, this is a development tool, and like any other development tool, we can not spec to have the creators write the solutions for us.
Terry Ford wrote: > On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:47 AM, Theodore H. Smith wrote: > > >> Is RB's code editor, using a standard RB editfield? >> > > I don't believe it is or ever was. As far as I can remember, it is a > custom canvas based control that they use. > > >> If not, what does that say about the usefulness of RB's editfield? >> > > Nothing. AFAIK, RB's editfield was never intended to be either a full > word processor or a platform for designing code for an application. > These are specialized uses that go far beyond what I feel is its > intended function. > > Although it has matured over the years and has had new features > added, I always considered it simply as a control to enter text for > later use. > > Terry > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
