Daniel Stenning wrote:
> Lets face it, neither GCC or Xcode have much need commercially to keep
> providing new sexy features - neither the open source community or Apple
> need to derive any income from their tools. Hence one can expect to see much
> higher fix to new feature ratio.
>
> Neither does MS really - for VS - since it is a de facto standard in so many
> ways - or a monopoly.
>
> RS has to derive a real income from its technology, and it has to keep
> moving with the market, aiming to attract new customers. MS doesn't need to
> do this, GNU doesn't, neither really does Apple.  I'm not excusing the
> bugginess or rushed nature of the last release, but I do think the weighing
> factors and market conditions should be borne in mind. Plus its history that
> IDE manufacturers regularly go to the dogs. Its a risky market. Clipper,
> Symantec C or Borland have all been victims of a harsh moving market. The
> open source brigade, Apple or MS don't have these concerns.
>   

Seems to me like RS is both prisoner and victim of their own strategy, 
rather than being pushed into a corner by the competition.

Ronald Vogelaar
http://www.rovosoft.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to