On Apr 10, 2007 5:07 PM, Jason Essington wrote: > On the other hand, we discovered right after the release of r1 that > number formatting was broken, we were in beta, and the bug only > showed up on the windows platform. We filed a bug report, and > received a response within a couple of hours that the bug was not > only verified, but it was fixed. Now, this formatting bug caused a > problem with the sending of numbers via the built in SOAP classes > (pretty much the entire whole of our program), so, at this point we > were stuck. It was less than a week after the release of r1, and a > very simple but catastrophic bug had been fixed for the next release, > but we wouldn't see it for 90 days.
Can you please let me know the report id for this "number formatting" bug? > I for one would really like to have a combination of the two release > programs. Keep the rapid release schedule, but at the same time, add > a point (bug fix / maintenance) release at 30 days and if needed 60 > days, to give the platform a chance to "settle down". If it turns > out that there are no bugs in the regular 90 day release then > obviously the interim builds would be unnecessary. Agree. > You know the old adage "never adopt a .0 release", well at this > point, that's all RB provides. ;-) Carlos _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
