I think opensim should cut off sl-support this year. It doesn't make sense to support sl-derived viewers much longer, when naali is becoming stable, and linden labs is even increasing the height of their walled gardens. It would be good for both opensim and realxtend, if functionality can be designed without keeping the constraints of the ancient ll-based viewer in mind.
Jeroen Op woensdag 24 februari 2010 11:05:15 schreef Ryan McDougall: > For those who've missed the IRC discussions: > > Seems LL is clamping down on what viewers will run on their network: > http://secondlife.com/corporate/tpv.php > > Naali *could* meet all those requirements in theory -- but I doubt > we'd be interested in complying with such onerous demands... > > I guess it's fair enough -- it's their network, and they can > arbitrarily decide whom they allow to connect and who not; however > it's pretty much destroyed any illusion it's an open network. > > Does this change anything for realXtend stake holders? Is there any > point in supporting SL features like SL avatars any more? > > Curious what others feel about this. > > Cheers, > -- http://groups.google.com/group/realxtend http://www.realxtend.org
