I agree with you David. Many programming languages have this problem. They seems like "experimental" languages, but almost nothing exists for real-world.
The question is: why this thing happen? Maybe because big magazine don't talk about it, since Rebol and Carl are not as big as IBM, Sun, etc... Maybe because Rebol is really different from traditional programming languages (imperative languages, that many people use). Or... ??? When I asked to the company where I work "Let's use Rebol, since we will get many benefits! Not only Rebol, but for specific tasks" they said "No, thank you, we already use ColdFusion and Delphi"... ??? They didn't asked me "what is Rebol?" - "What can we do with it?" - They said: "Rebol is a small company, too small, and not reliable" - (I don't report all the discussion !) So, I think in such poll, I could add "Create more applications for the real-world (GUI)". Or... "Create examples and templates for the real-world (GUI)". What do you think about it? --Alessandro On 5/20/06, Anton Rolls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, naturally, more is better, isn't it ? > > Anton. > > > Dear all, > > > > I created a small poll just to get a feedback about community-needs. > > You are kindly invited to submit your opinion about the following > > question: > > > > "Do think Rebol community needs more intruments? Tools? Docs?" > > > > Thank you! > > > > --Alessandro > > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > > -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
