No need to apologise for your posts Greg - they're good and interesting and probably very pertinent to REBOL. BTW, have you read Carl Sassenrath's posts on XML/CSS? They're here...
http://www.rebol.com/article/0108.html And the follow-up post... http://www.rebol.com/article/0110.html -- Carl Read. On Saturday, 8-September-2007 at 15:21:15 greg.schofield wrote, >I apologise to the list, but I cannot help but add more on a slightly dif= >ferent aspect of my previous post. > >And I must add a strange rider on oddities in how I am presenting things.= > > >1) I have not attempted to learn REBOL yet, let alone script with it, in = >fact I am confining myself to reading about it. > >2) I will learn REBOL from the basics up when R3 appears, the reason is s= >imple, I intend to write a conceptual introduction to REBOL, based on wha= >t I learn in practice, as I am leaning it (for the simple reason that cap= >turing the moment of understanding soon escapes when the knowledge is est= >ablished, I need to make notes as each idea sinks in rather than try and = >reconstruct it inaccuratetly - I believe REBOL is significantly different= > from other script langauges and that there is a gap in documentation tha= >t needs to be filled). [rest snipped] -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
