> I will try to write a solution where REBOL and "Commander" communicate > with a TCP socket, and stdout is returned to REBOL. It would work both > in Windows and UNIX. Cool, using sockets would be a more transparent solution. I didn't use them because I wanted a solution that can not be attacked over the net. But for non-secure enviroments this would be a good and more portable solution. CU, Frank -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
- [REBOL] Re: Shell access for Rebol, was: zip file supp... ryan . christiansen
- [REBOL] Commander.c adds Shell access for Rebol Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access for... Colin Brizell
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access... Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access for... GS Jones
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access... Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell ac... GS Jones
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds She... Michal Kracik
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds... Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Michal Kracik
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Deryk Robosson
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Harold Grovesteen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Michal Kracik
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Ryan Cole
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Michal Kracik
