> I think that network security is not a problem here. If I remember > correctly, with C socket library it's possible to listen only on > a specific interface. So if I listen only on local loopback interface > 127.0.0.1 and some port, noone from the network can attack my program. > But perhaps there is another problem that I overlooked? Maybe an other user (on the same machine) could try to attack. I think it would be good to have both solutions. And even better: RT would give us 'call for /core and /view. CU, Frank -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access for Rebol Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access for Rebol GS Jones
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access for Rebol Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access for R... GS Jones
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access f... Michal Kracik
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell acce... Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell... Michal Kracik
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell... Deryk Robosson
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell... Harold Grovesteen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell... Michal Kracik
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell... Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell... Ryan Cole
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell... Michal Kracik
