Michal Kracik wrote: > > Hi Frank, > > I think that network security is not a problem here. If I remember > correctly, with C socket library it's possible to listen only on > a specific interface. So if I listen only on local loopback interface > 127.0.0.1 and some port, noone from the network can attack my program. > But perhaps there is another problem that I overlooked? Sure, 127.* can be rerouted and an attack can take place that way. :) Deryk -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar -- -- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature -- File: smime.p7s -- Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
- [REBOL] Re: Shell access for Rebol, was: zip file supp... ryan . christiansen
- [REBOL] Commander.c adds Shell access for Rebol Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access for... Colin Brizell
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access... Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access for... GS Jones
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell access... Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds Shell ac... GS Jones
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds She... Michal Kracik
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c adds... Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Michal Kracik
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Deryk Robosson
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Harold Grovesteen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Michal Kracik
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Frank Sievertsen
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Ryan Cole
- [REBOL] Re: Commander.c ... Michal Kracik
