HOLGER / JEFF / EVERYBODY

After re-reading the tone of my earlier message I apologise if it came across as 
offensive and flamebait
and please accept my apologies for this.

However I still think the reasoning or justification Holger gave was flawed hence the 
tuple example I gave.

Sorry for any offence caused and I'll try to ensure my future mailings are focused 
more on the issues at hand
rahter than being misconstrued as flamebait.

Is Pair! a lame datatype?

cheers & sorry,

Mark  

In a message dated Wed, 6 Feb 2002  2:59:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, Jeff Kreis 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 
> Hello, robb0l:
> 
> > seems  reasonable  to  me,  but  then  again  so  do  Joels
> > arguments / logic,  saying pair! are only meant  to be used
> > strictly  in a Rebol/View  pixel co-ordinate  context seems
> > like a cop  out to me, either that  or insufficient thought
> > goes into REBOL language  design & implementation, which is
> > it Holger?
> 
> Hmm.. nice piece of flamebait. 
> 
> -jeff
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
> subject, without the quotes.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
subject, without the quotes.

Reply via email to