After reading another of your lame "oh dear, I'm sorry if I offended anyone, how did that happen, excuse me for your misunderstanding me yet again", I realized how very sharply your posts stand out from everyone else's.
Made me appreciate, once again, how very high the signal-to-noise is on this list. Thanks, Robbo, I guess. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 12:41 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Tuples - Was Pair! thread HOLGER / JEFF / EVERYBODY After re-reading the tone of my earlier message I apologise if it came across as offensive and flamebait and please accept my apologies for this. However I still think the reasoning or justification Holger gave was flawed hence the tuple example I gave. Sorry for any offence caused and I'll try to ensure my future mailings are focused more on the issues at hand rahter than being misconstrued as flamebait. Is Pair! a lame datatype? cheers & sorry, Mark In a message dated Wed, 6 Feb 2002 2:59:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, Jeff Kreis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hello, robb0l: > > > seems reasonable to me, but then again so do Joels > > arguments / logic, saying pair! are only meant to be used > > strictly in a Rebol/View pixel co-ordinate context seems > > like a cop out to me, either that or insufficient thought > > goes into REBOL language design & implementation, which is > > it Holger? > > Hmm.. nice piece of flamebait. > > -jeff > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the > subject, without the quotes. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
