> You haven't answered why you consider Rugby being blocking one ;-) I
> tried Ruby several times and it does some 250 RPC echos in a sec ... So, 
> what is enough for you? :-)

I'm not talking about speed or Rugby's efficiency, which is certainly
admirable, but there are things Rugby can't do anything about ...

Rugby is blocking when executing long-running functions, like doing
data analysis involving data gathering from multiple data sources (and
many scenarios more).

I've just had a look at the cooperative threading model, and it might
be good enough for a lot of cases (though, in general, I don't like
coop multithreading too much, it usually complexifies otherwise simple
programs enormously).

> PS: what does your grin mean? Do you know something we don't? :-)

Unfortunately not.

That's why I am asking here ...

BTW, Roger Sessions may well talk a lot of nonsense, but his
observation regarding SOAP I support. SOAP is (rather) complex when
compared to XML-RPC or REBOL messaging. It is probably extremely
simple simple when compared to CORBA.

And he who deems "XML" simple hasn't seen it in its full glory.

-- Chris

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the 
subject, without the quotes.

Reply via email to