what do you do when the included scripts totalize more than 500k of code? do you create a 501KB file for each script?
why is run-time linking so bad if the engine is standardized and the resources are centralized and "official" in some way? -MAx --- "You can either be part of the problem or part of the solution, but in the end, being part of the problem is much more fun." > -----Original Message----- > From: "Robert M. M�nch" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: DLL Hell = Rebol library script version > > > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:28:36 +1300, Andrew Martin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > When distributing a Rebol script, > > include all the functions (words) that the main script requires. Of > > course, the problem here is that most of us have nice toolkits of > > functions that we want to use in our main script > applications, and it's > > pointless manually copying and pasting from our toolkit because that > > just produces multiple copies, with no definitive, > authoritive source. > > Hi, IMO that's they way to go: Include all stuff in one > script. As long as > this particular script works, there is no need to update the included > part. How to do it? Well, include PREBOL in the core engine. > I don't know > why this isn't done. Replace the #... PREBOL commands thru > something like > $... and have the interpreter recognize this. > > -- > Robert M. M�nch > Management & IT Freelancer > Mobile: +49 (177) 245 2802 > http://www.robertmuench.de > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
