Am Dienstag, 11. November 2003 19:11 schrieb Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch:
> I find it funny that there is so much differing opinions on this topic.
>
>   :-D which makes it lively a topic/list to follow and discuss  :-)
>
> python is built over a library standard and it is all the better for it. 
> It allows a large group of developpers to contribute to the package
> completely transparently.  I'M not saying I like python itself, only that I
> recognize how its modules ideology has helped it.
>
> There are things missing in its library methods which do make it a little
> dangerous to use to share code, but if it gets placed into the core
> distribution, it becomes safe cause its api has to get "locked".
>

In our case that would be, its in rebol-runtime. Fortunally or not, rebols 
have decided Carl defines the /core.
Today with RT low on manpower.
Its a bit tricky to decide if something is not included because of manpower or 
because it dilutes the core.

> I DO think that python has TOO many libraries and that a greater effort at
> reducing code duplication and mismatch should have been done for the core
> distribution.  One obvious and basic problem is the fact that there are
> string functions AND string methods, but NOT ALL methods have function
> equivalents, which is a bad design IMHO. I'm always wondering if such and
> such an operation is a method or a function....  :-(
>

diluting is a good word, specially in connection with liquid, no? ;)

> I'm trying to learn from other's mistake (but can't say I'm an all knowing
> guru ;-).
>
> Like I said, I'll be releasing more information with more specific details
> of what I want to provide as a linkable library system.  Judgment by trial.
>  ;-)
>
> The loader's essential functionality is working on my system.
>

Another point about a loader is, Rebol has already one. Its called IOS. 
Unfortunally its soo expensive. 
so 
+ building such stuff is fun
+ its a lot cheaper
- makes competition to RT based on its own products?

> I need to work on a real setup/install application which actually can look
> up your setup.  this would handler both core and vid setups (text or vid
> install :-)

If its for fun, i am all for it. But you talk a lot about setting standards.
And rebol-standards should be RT's decision IMHO.

-Volker

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to