here's the link
Yeah well put both Justin and Dominick - and no worries Justin, we're always glad to have people helping us out in which ever form that might be
What you've said is true, and I think we've stuck to that. In looking at the roadmap ( http://www.osflash.org/red5/roadmap) I think we've been able to stay on track. We've shifted some of the core features around based on what we felt was most critical/needed by the community. But certainly, we need to hear feedback if we're working on something that the community feels is not necessary at this point.
Also, you should get on the Red5Devs list. I think THIS list tends to give the perception we're working on things that we're really not. The dev's list is a great way to see exactly who's working on what and when. It's really a much better indicator of where we're really at and working on.
Thanks again, and don't worry about tweaking noses ;)
JohnOn 4/11/06, Dominick Accattato <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hi Justin:I can see your point. There are a lot of requests. Between .4 and .6 I think that Red5 will reach a realization of who we are. The API and setting up applications are the most important features for end developers. Right now, setting up an application consists of copying some config files but eventually the admin interface will make it as simple as filling in a name and clicking a button. The API is also taking shape. It too will be scrubbed for feature creep. Again, good observation but for the moment we need to press on. Hopefully things become clear with more documentation.
On 4/11/06, Justin Lewis < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:This is just my observation, but I detect the early signs of a little mission creep setting in with Red5. When I first discovered Red5 it had gotten off to a flying start with a working rtmp streaming server. Maybe it's not my place to say, and this if for the projects leaders to decide but I think there's a little creep setting in from what I perceived was the original goal. I see a lot of talk on the list about porting, adding non core features and doing a whole load of things that aren't that necessary in a communication server.
I just think that Red5 should be a very approachable server, the key to that is the core API so keeping as near as possible to the standard Macromedia API's in order to attract Flash Coders and Designers. I think all the other functionality everyone's spoken about could then be best achieved by making the server extensible via plug ins with a flash-esque API that can be consumed natively within any Red5 flash comm. Script. Then, for the super doper clever stuff that any Java coder wants to add on it's up to them to get stuck in and mod Red5 as they see fit, it is after all open source.
Hope I've not put noses out of joint?
Regards
Justin.
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org--
John Grden - Blitz
--
John Grden - Blitz
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
