Below my "argumentation": > I've investigated this road, while I was implementing the AJAX client. My > biggest design-issue was that I had to support two client-versions, since I > don't want to rule out M$ Explorer, Safari, Opera and the like. Can you give > an argumentation why I should do it after all?
The advantage of HTML (and to some extent also JavaScript and flash) is that NO Client installation is necessary. With screencasting, the authors or moderators need anyway to install an additional software. That is the point. Whether it is a 5,5 MB browser (plus an easy installable extension) or a just a standalone application, it's about the same hassle for the user (I guess not everybody agrees with me on that). So I prefer the extension, because my target audience for screenkasting authors are firefox users (Firefox is the most used browser for techsavy geeks), so it's easier for them to install and easier for me to develop. I am open to hear other opinions .. -- Roberto Saccon _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
