yeah I'd agree that we have to take care of remaining issues like what you described. We're thinking that an RC2 will most likely happen to make sure we have a VERY strong v0.6 final

Thanks Dan, appreciate your help very much,

john

On 11/9/06, Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Grden wrote:
>
>
> agreed, if you get into other features beyond something basic, then
> you get into the api, but I see a clean/clear line between those 2
> topics.  would you agree?

We'd have to see whos requirements are more than just out of the box
then, but yes a skeleton adaptor does what you said, but dont you have
to setup the SO first and perisistance objects were breaking the server
from starting up again only recently.

Im going to put what I know are issues into another thread then, coz
they have yet to be resolved and i guess they should before the release
of 0.6.

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org



--
[  JPG  ]
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to