Dario De Agostini wrote:
Manolo R.G. wrote:
  
But perhaps Dario is right...
  
    
well we tried it :)
if you try using a virtual camera driver and capture a 800x600 (or worse 
1024x768) you will clearly see that:
1) flash player suffers an high cpu usage in order to encode the video
2) you need a HUGE bandwidth because it sends the whole frame (screen) 
on each keyframe.
3) video quality is horrible because the encoding scheme 
(keyframes+difference frames, jpeg encoded) is not suitable to this kind 
of stream

there may be much more... but i don't remeber it now (it has been more 
than 1 year ago).

So, as far as we know, this is not the way to achieve screensharing.
(we don't know any good one, with flash)
  
Wouldn't it be possible with eg. 1024x768 capture from a virtual cameradriver if the the movie desktop played really slow, lets say one frame per second?
Otherise now with the new AcctionScript 3 / haxe ... VM  wich for example built http://osflash.org/fc64 , wouldn't it be possible to deliver fullscreen pictures at some rate somehow osflash?

BR / Hans Elgelid
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to