On 5/25/07, Mondain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I for one would prefer that our implementation not require a specific container (tomcat or jetty). This would allow the WAR version to work without any special "hacks". Paul
IMHO, Red5 doesn't belong to a container at all - having a web app that listens itself on several ports and doesn't use at all the container's URLs (but for examples browsing) is not "natural". The only case is if you could use a Servlet for RTMPT/S, but that can not be achieved along with other web applications running: Red5 must 'own' the root path, or at least some (/open, /idle etc.) sub-paths of the container. Correct me if I'm wrong, Vlad
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
