For testing purposes I'm posting this URL: http://babbavideo.com/nl/player/710/repent_vj_crew_demo_video.html it's a movie I made myself
Could as much as many Red5 developers access this movie? On 6/18/07, Steven Gong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/18/07, Martijn van Beek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The output ant gives to the console. (I'm new to ant) Well, if you are not working on jar, you can modify the log4j.propertiesfile manually by changing the log4j.rootCategory=DEBUG, CONSOLE to log4j.rootCategory=DEBUG, FLOG The log file will be red5.log On 6/18/07, Steven Gong < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/18/07, Martijn van Beek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Well that currently hard to say because the server died and didn't > > > leave any logs (he couldn't access the filesystem). I'm almost finished with > > > another part of the Red5 app I'm building after that I will post an url of a > > > movie. If everyone can access that movie maybe I can see the amount of > > > connections and post the data here. > > > > > > I run Red5 with ant, is there a way I can store the logs? > > > > > > What logs do you refer to? The server log or the log you record > > yourself? > > > > On 6/18/07, Steven Gong < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/18/07, Martijn van Beek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I'm not streaming live data but stored flv movies. And the > > > > > problem then appears when a lot of people access the file at the same time > > > > > but all at a different position (in time). > > > > > > > > > > > > That IS a problem which might be solved by a cache system. FMS > > > > uses cache on Edge servers. > > > > > > > > Martijn, could you please give more data about this issue? How > > > > many concurrent accesses will become a bottleneck for the I/O reading of > > > > FLV? > > > > > > > > On 6/17/07, Steven Gong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Orion, > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/17/07, Orion Letizi < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While it may be impractical to cluster the actual AV data in > > > > > > > the stream, > > > > > > > perhaps the current state (metadata) of the stream could be > > > > > > > clustered so > > > > > > > that, as long as the AV data was available on disk at each > > > > > > > server, any > > > > > > > server could pick up the stream and start serving it based > > > > > > > on the metadata > > > > > > > about the stream (e.g., offset into the data file, current > > > > > > > position of > > > > > > > buffers, stuff like that). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yep, that's true if the VOD streaming is pulled by the client. > > > > > > But as we also need to track the client buffer, we are using a scheduled > > > > > > task to push the VOD content to the client. > > > > > > > > > > > > I was thinking of sharing the connection buffer across the > > > > > > cluster if the connection is of type RTMPTConnection. When the connection is > > > > > > of type RTMPT, we use a buffer for each connection to save the packets that > > > > > > will be sent to the client. These packets includes AV packets, RSO packets, > > > > > > invocation result etc. When the client's request is distributed to one of > > > > > > the node, the server retrieves packets in the buffer and sends to the > > > > > > client. So all kinds of services, regardless of VOD, Live or RSO, can be > > > > > > shared without the need to share the whole connection or stream objects. > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course, I share Steve Harris's lack of knowledge of the > > > > > > > internals of > > > > > > > Red5, so my observation might be dumb, nonsensical, or both > > > > > > > for which I > > > > > > > apologize in advance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/16/07, sharrissf < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assuming the stream fits in memory and just has multiple > > > > > > > people accessing > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > I suspect it could be clustered with Terracotta. Though I > > > > > > > would need to > > > > > > > > know > > > > > > > > more details to know for sure as I'm not that familiar > > > > > > > with how they work > > > > > > > > and are implemented. My thinking is that everyone in this > > > > > > > case is > > > > > > > > essentially sharing the same stream so really only one > > > > > > > instance ends up in > > > > > > > > each jvm and all the meta-data associated with each user > > > > > > > is only in the > > > > > > > > jvm > > > > > > > > where the person is connected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The live stream is pushed to the subscribers just like what > > > > > > > Remote > > > > > > > SharedObject does so if configured properly I believe it can > > > > > > > be clustered by > > > > > > > TC. But I doubt that this is practically realistic because > > > > > > > (1) The amount of AV data is much bigger than that of RSO. > > > > > > > So much more data > > > > > > > will be transfered across the nodes. > > > > > > > (2) When the amount of data arises, the transfer latency > > > > > > > will also arise and > > > > > > > the real time requirement of live streaming is compromised. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway we can implement it technically and whether it's > > > > > > > practical will be > > > > > > > decided by the application. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/Load-balancing-for-live-streams-tf3926799.html#a11155612 > > > > > > > Sent from the Red5 - English mailing list archive at > > > > > > > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > Red5 mailing list > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for > > > > > > small needs it never asks, or knows or remembers. -- Tagore > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > Steven Gong > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Red5 mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Red5 mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for > > > > small needs it never asks, or knows or remembers. -- Tagore > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > Steven Gong > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Red5 mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Red5 mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small > > needs it never asks, or knows or remembers. -- Tagore > > > > Best Regards > > Steven Gong > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Red5 mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > -- I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small needs it never asks, or knows or remembers. -- Tagore Best Regards Steven Gong _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
