Update: This has been formally placed into the enhancement request system. I am working on many different aspects within the Solution Exchange community and shall endeavour to expose more visibility of these systems in the future.
Regards, Dan. On 23 August 2010 10:26, Danny Baggs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've sent this thread through to the relevant people within the R&D team. > Whilst I cannot this enhancement directly as a result, this is the sort of > conversation that those within the core development team need to be more > exposed to. > > Regards, > > Dan. > > > On 23 August 2010 05:58, markus giesen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I fourth this "feature request/bug fix" >> and think Kims solution should be part of the base product. >> >> Dear OpenText, please buy this solution of Kim and send him to New >> York or the Bahamas as a thank you. >> Markus. >> >> On 19 Aug., 13:09, kimdezen <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I actually create my own custom 'add page' reddots within projects >> > that automatically preassign Prefixes to page titles (for non >> > foundation pages - or page parts) >> > >> > This way users can automatically see what is a 'full' page rather than >> > a part of a page in the search list (since the headline isnt actually >> > really used for anything) >> > >> > On Aug 19, 10:46 am, theHam <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > I second a "hide from search options" an content class authorisation >> > > package option >> > >> > > The best workaround i can think of is throwing all the non-user >> > > relevant content classes in a folder with a "z_" prefix to put it >> > > lower in the list. >> > >> > > - Morgan >> > >> > > On Aug 18, 12:08 pm, kimdezen <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > Unfortunately not.. users will need to select the Content Class >> filter >> > > > each time they perform a search to do this. >> > >> > > > (if this is not the case, then i would love to know how!!) >> > >> > > > This is a shame really, since there are occasions when you dont want >> > > > users to search and link to system pages (headers, footers, 404 >> pages >> > > > etc) - and also it makes it difficult for users to differentiate the >> > > > difference between 'foundation' pages and 'page parts/components'. >> > >> > > > On Aug 17, 7:45 am, RedDot in Toronto <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > > So be more specific I mean the Search for page search results in >> CMS. >> > >> > > > > On Aug 16, 5:43 pm, RedDot in Toronto <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > Does anyone know if there is a way omit certain content classes >> from >> > > > > > ever appearing in search results? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "RedDot CMS Users" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<reddot-cms-users%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
