Word! On 25 Aug., 08:58, kimdezen <[email protected]> wrote: > You the man! > > On Aug 23, 8:00 pm, Danny Baggs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Update: This has been formally placed into the enhancement request system. > > I am working on many different aspects within the Solution Exchange > > community and shall endeavour to expose more visibility of these systems in > > the future. > > > Regards, > > > Dan. > > > On 23 August 2010 10:26, Danny Baggs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I've sent this thread through to the relevant people within the R&D team. > > > Whilst I cannot this enhancement directly as a result, this is the sort > > > of > > > conversation that those within the core development team need to be more > > > exposed to. > > > > Regards, > > > > Dan. > > > > On 23 August 2010 05:58, markus giesen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I fourth this "feature request/bug fix" > > >> and think Kims solution should be part of the base product. > > > >> Dear OpenText, please buy this solution of Kim and send him to New > > >> York or the Bahamas as a thank you. > > >> Markus. > > > >> On 19 Aug., 13:09, kimdezen <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > I actually create my own custom 'add page' reddots within projects > > >> > that automatically preassign Prefixes to page titles (for non > > >> > foundation pages - or page parts) > > > >> > This way users can automatically see what is a 'full' page rather than > > >> > a part of a page in the search list (since the headline isnt actually > > >> > really used for anything) > > > >> > On Aug 19, 10:46 am, theHam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > I second a "hide from search options" an content class authorisation > > >> > > package option > > > >> > > The best workaround i can think of is throwing all the non-user > > >> > > relevant content classes in a folder with a "z_" prefix to put it > > >> > > lower in the list. > > > >> > > - Morgan > > > >> > > On Aug 18, 12:08 pm, kimdezen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > Unfortunately not.. users will need to select the Content Class > > >> filter > > >> > > > each time they perform a search to do this. > > > >> > > > (if this is not the case, then i would love to know how!!) > > > >> > > > This is a shame really, since there are occasions when you dont > > >> > > > want > > >> > > > users to search and link to system pages (headers, footers, 404 > > >> pages > > >> > > > etc) - and also it makes it difficult for users to differentiate > > >> > > > the > > >> > > > difference between 'foundation' pages and 'page parts/components'. > > > >> > > > On Aug 17, 7:45 am, RedDot in Toronto <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > So be more specific I mean the Search for page search results in > > >> CMS. > > > >> > > > > On Aug 16, 5:43 pm, RedDot in Toronto <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > Does anyone know if there is a way omit certain content classes > > >> from > > >> > > > > > ever appearing in search results? > > > >> -- > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > >> "RedDot CMS Users" group. > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> [email protected]<reddot-cms-users%[email protected]> > > >> . > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.
