You the man!

On Aug 23, 8:00 pm, Danny Baggs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Update: This has been formally placed into the enhancement request system.
>  I am working on many different aspects within the Solution Exchange
> community and shall endeavour to expose more visibility of these systems in
> the future.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan.
>
> On 23 August 2010 10:26, Danny Baggs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > I've sent this thread through to the relevant people within the R&D team.
> >  Whilst I cannot this enhancement directly as a result, this is the sort of
> > conversation that those within the core development team need to be more
> > exposed to.
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Dan.
>
> > On 23 August 2010 05:58, markus giesen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> I fourth this "feature request/bug fix"
> >> and think Kims solution should be part of the base product.
>
> >> Dear OpenText, please buy this solution of Kim and send him to New
> >> York or the Bahamas as a thank you.
> >> Markus.
>
> >> On 19 Aug., 13:09, kimdezen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > I actually create my own custom 'add page' reddots within projects
> >> > that automatically preassign Prefixes to page titles (for non
> >> > foundation pages - or page parts)
>
> >> > This way users can automatically see what is a 'full' page rather than
> >> > a part of a page in the search list (since the headline isnt actually
> >> > really used for anything)
>
> >> > On Aug 19, 10:46 am, theHam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > I second a "hide from search options" an content class authorisation
> >> > > package option
>
> >> > > The best workaround i can think of is throwing all the non-user
> >> > > relevant content classes in a folder with a "z_" prefix to put it
> >> > > lower in the list.
>
> >> > >  - Morgan
>
> >> > > On Aug 18, 12:08 pm, kimdezen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > Unfortunately not.. users will need to select the Content Class
> >> filter
> >> > > > each time they perform a search to do this.
>
> >> > > > (if this is not the case, then i would love to know how!!)
>
> >> > > > This is a shame really, since there are occasions when you dont want
> >> > > > users to search and link to system pages (headers, footers, 404
> >> pages
> >> > > > etc) - and also it makes it difficult for users to differentiate the
> >> > > > difference between 'foundation' pages and 'page parts/components'.
>
> >> > > > On Aug 17, 7:45 am, RedDot in Toronto <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > So be more specific I mean the Search for page search results in
> >> CMS.
>
> >> > > > > On Aug 16, 5:43 pm, RedDot in Toronto <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > Does anyone know if there is a way omit certain content classes
> >> from
> >> > > > > > ever appearing in search results?
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "RedDot CMS Users" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<reddot-cms-users%[email protected]>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RedDot CMS Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to