On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Jian Huang <[email protected]>wrote:
I tried the page and module idea too, but the feedback was that people > often get confused about an actual HTML page and a page in CMS. > > Sorry Jian, I totally missed your response until Joel's latest post bumped the thread! On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Joel Kinzel <[email protected]> wrote: > > We used "Foundation Page" and "Content Block" to distinguish between the > two. We say that a "Foudation Page" is equivalent to a full HTML page, and > that a "content block" is a piece of that page. > The problem with "foundation" is that nobody else in the web world calls a page template a "foundation". Plus, there is also the possibility that sometime in the future, a foundation page could embed another page which was a foundation page at one time. That's just the modular nature of the OpenText system. In fact, until Jian trained our team, I never even heard the term "foundation" used in our CMS. So it's apparent that we need a more useful vocabulary that work with content folks. -Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
