I wasn't aware that 6.2 had an up2date on it. The 6.1 box I'm
running does not.
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:27:04 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Michael Burger wrote:
>
>> Not really. You'd be surprised just how well it works if you specify
>> --nosig on the command line. <G>
>>
>
>The 'up2date' I have on my 6.2 box does not recognize the '--nosig'
>option.
>
>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:08:14 +1100, Greg Wright wrote:
>>
>> >Does it not require money or a registration ? if yes still, then this may
>> >be a problem, otherwise you could apply your beer theory, who knows, on a
>> >Saturday night it may just work Ed ;-).
>>
>
>I went through all this with Redhat yesterday. 'up2date' will not work
>without a valid authorization. IMO, 'up2date' should connect to
>'priority' ftp servers if you have authorization, and connect to
>non-priority servers if you do not have authorization. At the very least,
>'up2date' should work for non-authorized accounts in the case of updating
>of software that have security or system threatening problems.
>
> - Martin J. Brown, Jr. -
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>
> PGP Public Key ID: 0xCED9BD8A Key Server: http://www.keyserver.net/en/
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
