-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian Ashe wrote:
>> The OP won't go wrong with either one, but I suspect she'll find more >> documentation for MySQL than for PostgreSQL, which might be a >> significant consideration. > >I find this highly inaccurate. The reason being that I believe there is so >much written to document MySQL is due to the fact that it is not a standards >compliant SQL implementation and geared towards people looking for some RDBMS >functionality without having to learn a lot of stuff. Hence the reason for >some of the "crutches" that MySQL has (that are convenient) that are not in >other RDBMS to eliviate the need for more advanced programming skills. So >exclusive docs must be written. Fair enough, and you're right. I based my evaluation simply on the quantity of literature available, but your point about its exclusivity is well taken. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPCPDnr9BpdPKTBGtEQKV+gCfX270hsEM87hMUQGkPQr27ONKCP8An0YT puBV3hPmkyq8LZMXRQP6lqKc =7Rhb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
