Adam West.

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I bet you have a poster of Joe West on your bedroom wall.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>  *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tom Salemi
> *Sent:* Friday, June 04, 2010 8:44 AM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Umpires
>
>   Yes, and these screwed up calls are just killing the sport. I'm not sure
> if baseball will survive another 150 years.
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, it is baseball's heritage to screw up calls.  Let's not mess with
>> that.
>>
>> And by the way, there is a big different between the "Amica pitch-zone"
>> that Remy likes to criticize and the QuesTec system which uses 4 cameras and
>> adjusts for the size of each batter.
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tom Salemi
>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 03, 2010 11:55 AM
>>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: Umpires
>>
>>   Perhaps it shouldn't. No sport is as bound to history as baseball.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:19 AM, William Marino 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  Calling balls and strikes with a computer and video camera may not be
>>> perfect, but at least it would be consistent. Players would adjust. Having a
>>> different guy out there every night with a different view of the strike zone
>>> is crazy. Baseball has been around for over a hundred years, and technology
>>> has developed. Baseball has not.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------
>>> Sent using BlackBerry
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>  From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Thu Jun 03 10:19:41 2010
>>> Subject: Re: Umpires
>>>
>>> Remy, Merloni and other former players question the ball and strike
>>> technology, at least what's used on TV.  I'm not sure it's as infallible as
>>> you all like to think.
>>>
>>> Instant reply is a different issue entirely. I support that.
>>>
>>> And yes, the umpires should have consulted with one another. I'm not sure
>>> it would have made a difference but it should have been done.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Beaudoin, John <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>         I think Jerry Crasnick just lost all credibility among peers and
>>> viewers.  And his comments are not even worth debating.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         But the issue of replay is worth debating.
>>>
>>>         Very simply, it works in football and hockey and some college
>>> sports as well.  It works in the same kind of close play situations that
>>> occur in baseball.  Did he make the catch?  Were his feet in bounds?  Did
>>> the clock run out?  Etc.  It’s been proven to work.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         And as far as balls and strikes go, well, it’s been proven to
>>> work in tennis, which is very similar in technology to the balls and strikes
>>> thing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         So, we have proof that it can work and I have not heard any valid
>>> arguments against it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         Dump the umps.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         John
>>>
>>>         ________________________________
>>>
>>>                 From: [email protected] [
>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
>>> On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
>>>         Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 9:56 AM
>>>
>>>         To: [email protected]
>>>         Subject: Re: Umpires
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         Judging by football, the crowd get's pretty happy when that
>>> happens.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         I was at a Sox game when they overturned an Ortiz home run that
>>> had been called a triple.  The crowd went wild.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Matt & Olga McSorley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Jerry Crasnick on ESPN.com. This is the second media person I've
>>> heard say this, and it's the absolute most daft thing I've ever read:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         "Inevitably, the game's sad ending is going to elicit an outcry
>>> for expanded use of instant replay. It's a worthwhile debate, but consider
>>> this for a second: How gratifying would it have felt if Joyce's botched call
>>> was followed by a trip to the replay booth, a five-minute conference, the
>>> umpiring crew emerging from the tunnel and Joyce throwing up his right arm
>>> with an "out" sign.
>>>
>>>         Yes, Galarraga would have had his perfect game, on paper, but
>>> that single transcendent moment of celebration is something that can never
>>> be retrieved. In baseball or any other sport, winners don't get mulligans on
>>> euphoria."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         ________________________________
>>>
>>>                 From: Steve Gendron <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>         To: "[email protected]" <
>>> [email protected]>
>>>
>>>         Sent: Thu, June 3, 2010 8:39:13 AM
>>>         Subject: RE: Umpires
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         When you watch the play, you see that as Gallaraga comes off the
>>> bag, he shifts the ball in his glove.  To the naked eye, it could appear
>>> that he didn't have control of the ball until after he was off the bag.  In
>>> slow motion, it is apparent that he did have control of the ball while on
>>> the bag.  I think that is why Joyce called him safe.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         Other than instant replay, it would be tough to automate calls
>>> like this.  But balls and strikes at home plate should be a piece of cake.
>>> Dump the umps.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                 ________________________________
>>>
>>>                                 From: [email protected] [
>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
>>> On Behalf Of Matt & Olga McSorley
>>>                 Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 8:13 AM
>>>                 To: [email protected]
>>>                 Subject: Re: Umpires
>>>
>>>                 I think Joyce knew he blew the call right away. Cabrera
>>> at first, and then Leyland after the 28th out was recorded, read him the
>>> absolute riot act and Joyce stood there and took it. Umps don't take that
>>> kind of crap unless they know they're wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                 -- Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                 ________________________________
>>>
>>>                                 From: "Beaudoin, John" <
>>> [email protected]>
>>>                 To: [email protected]
>>>
>>>                 Sent: Thu, June 3, 2010 8:05:51 AM
>>>                 Subject: Re: Umpires
>>>
>>>                 Sorry Steve.
>>>                 But that's your self-imposed criterion. It's not mine.
>>>
>>>                 Costing that pitchers millions in endorsements and income
>>> is cause enough.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                 ________________________________
>>>
>>>                                 From: [email protected] <
>>> [email protected]>
>>>                 To: [email protected] <
>>> [email protected]>
>>>                 Sent: Thu Jun 03 04:53:41 2010
>>>                 Subject: RE: Umpires
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                  > But the ultimate measure of an enforcement mechanism
>>> is whether or not it disrupted the competitive balance of a game. It did
>>> not.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                 But it easily could have.  And umpire mistakes effect the
>>> game all the time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                 --
>>>                 You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>> the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>                 To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>>                 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]><
>>> mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>                 For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>>                 --
>>>
>>>                 You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>> the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>                 To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>>                 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]><
>>> mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>                 For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>>                 --
>>>
>>>                 You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>> the Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>                 To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>>                 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]><
>>> mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>                 For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>>         --
>>>
>>>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>> Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>         To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>>         To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]><
>>> mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>         For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>>         --
>>>
>>>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>> Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>         To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>>         To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]><
>>> mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>         For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         --
>>>
>>>         Author of "FPGA Simulation: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide"
>>>         www.fpgasimulation.com <http://www.fpgasimulation.com/>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         --
>>>
>>>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>> Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>         To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>>         To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]><
>>> mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>         For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>>                 --
>>>
>>>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>> Google Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>         To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>>         To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]><
>>> mailto:redsoxcitizens%[email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>         For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>>     --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>
>>   --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
>   --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<redsoxcitizens%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to