I think the ability to change the stories on the fly has interesting
implications for reporting.  I suspect it will reduce the amount of
fact checking that gets done.

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, he definitely could have done a better job.  But his story was all
> over the national sports outlets, for a short time anyway.  I find it
> interesting that we are talking about his reports about the size of the
> contract today, after he had the story wrong yesterday.  Short memories I
> guess.
>
> I have not seen The Paper, but I'll check it out on Netflix.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Salemi
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 9:49 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Deal Done
>
> Steve, there's a scene in one of my all-time favorite movies, The Paper. Two
> editors are arguing over what headline best describes a grisly crime in NYC
> and the arrest of two teenage suspects.
>
> One editor wanted "Gotcha;" the other pushed for "They didn't Do it" because
> he was confident the arrest was just a publicity move by the police
> departmetn but couldn't prove it. When he raised the fact that the two kids
> arrested for the crime might actually be innocent, the other editor - his
> boss - countered that "We only have to be right today."
>
> It's an entertaining bit of hyperbole, but it's germane to this. Heyman
> might have been right, at that minute. What he didn't do was provide the
> necessary analysis that this might just be a bargaining ploy and the deal
> could still get done.
>
> I guess it's slightly embrassing, but I think reporters are cut a lot slack
> for missing context because they need to rush to get the story out. And
> there's an understanding that any article can be rewritten and republished
> the next minute or hour.
>
> At the of the day (or the hour or the minute) I bet only a relative handful
> of people saw this article so all will be forgotten. But he could have done
> a better job, in my opinion.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Frankly, this is  no better than "Let's talk about it in April."
>> Because, I can assure you that A-Gon's agent will change his mind once the
>> Sox have put him in the lineup.
>> Ray
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Steve Gendron <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> It's not a "side deal", it's just the timing of the deal - the start date
>>> - that they are setting.  That kind of thing is fine, but it just means the
>>> "customer", A-Gon in this case, could still change his mind.  That makes me
>>> a little uneasy - but I'm sure it will be fine.  Glad to hear Heyman had it
>>> wrong.
>>>
>>> You reporters out there, don't you think this kind of thing should be
>>> embarrassing to Heyman and SI?  Doesn't this damage his credibility in the
>>> journalistic world?
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Salemi
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 9:18 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Deal Done
>>>
>>> I can't believe that would be allowed.
>>> We, in software sales, can't do anything called a "side-agreement".  I'm
>>> sure that's not allowed for the Sox.  They're deals are much bigger than
>>> ours.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Steve Ouellette <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If they sign him to the extension now, his average annual salary is
>>>> factored into the luxury tax calculations for this year. If they wait until
>>>> after opening day, only his $6 million or so on his current contract goes 
>>>> on
>>>> the books -- so about $17 million less on the luxury tax figures.
>>>>
>>>> Steve O
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't understand this.  How does dorking around with the negotiations
>>>>> help with the luxury tax?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, that's kind of iffy. I feel dirty.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2010 8:41 PM, "Steve Ouellette" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or the Sox were just making it LOOK like they really, really couldn't
>>>>>> agree on a deal so the commish's office doesn't investigate anything 
>>>>>> fishy
>>>>>> when they wait until after opening day -- which actually does give them a
>>>>>> large luxury tax advantage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve O
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Do you think the negotia...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Author of Robot Haiku : Poems for humans to read until their robots
>>>>> decide it's kill time.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Author of Robot Haiku : Poems for humans to read until their robots
>>> decide it's kill time.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Author of Robot Haiku : Poems for humans to read until their robots decide
>> it's kill time.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>



-- 
Author of Robot Haiku : Poems for humans to read until their robots
decide it's kill time.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to