dunia mungkin tidak senang...
tetapi rakyat senang, minimal saya.....


--- On Sun, 4/12/09, Harya Setyaka <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Harya Setyaka <[email protected]>
Subject: [referensi] Fwd: President Yudhoyono's Big Decision [By The Heritage 
Foundation's  Walter Lohman]
To: "Harya Setyaka" <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 6:47 AM











    
            
            


      
      

Koalisi SBY-PKS ?
Bagaimana kira-2 reaksi dunia?
-K-




---------- Forwarded message ----------







The Heritage Foundation

April 10, 2009



Indonesian President Yudhoyono's Big Decision



By Walter Lohman



WebMemo #2393



Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY) is a clear

winner in his country's April 9 parliamentary (DPR) elections.

Indications are that SBY's Democrat Party has increased its 7.5

percent support from the 2004 DPR elections to approximately 20

percent. Whether his party clears the legal 20 percent threshold

of seats required to name its own presidential candidate does

not practically matter: Either way, SBY will need to form a

governing coalition. The most important part of the coalition

will be his choice of a vice presidential running mate.



The Islamist Failure



The other major outcome of the election is the considerable

setback dealt to the Indonesian Islamist parties. PKS, the

ideology's standard bearer, failed to improve substantially from

its 2004 share. Throughout the last year, PKS held firmly to a

goal of garnering 20 percent of the vote. That was probably

never in the cards. But they outwitted themselves on the 15

percent they might have reasonably hoped for. To expand their

base, PKS sought to appeal to Indonesian nationalism and

downplay their Islamism. They portrayed themselves as members of

the political elite, ingratiated themselves with SBY at every

opportunity, and floated coalition balloons with each of the

mainstream parties.



The PKS campaign failed. If Indonesians voted out of a sense of

nationalism, they went with more trusted sources: a president

who has largely led the country in the right direction and older

parties with which voters are more comfortable.



At the same time, PKS failed to pick up defections from the

other Islamist parties. Two of these parties went below the 2.5

percent threshold for representation in parliament. And the

fourth, the PPP of the Suharto era, continued its long decline,

presently hovering around 5 percent of yesterday's vote total.

It is unclear where all these voters went—although given its

poor performance, it seems certain that they did not go to PKS.

Maybe they were as confused by PKS's appeals to non-sectarian

nationalism as everyone else. Polling before the election also

indicated the possibility of migration from the Pancasila-based

Muslim parties—PKB and PAN—to PKS. This also does not appear to

have happened.



No political victories are permanent. In 1999, PKS itself failed

to make the threshold necessary to contest the 2004 elections.

It changed its name to qualify and emerged in 2004 with 45 seats

and three cabinet posts. They turned the name change to their

advantage, using it to obscure their previously more explicit

ideological agenda. They have been running from those roots ever

since to good, steady effect—until now. Their loss will

exacerbate infighting and likely lead them to rely more on their

missionary political work, which continues apace whatever this

week's national election results.



Unfortunately, however, there is one other possibility that

could save PKS from its defeat and pending turmoil.



Vice Presidential Lottery



The Indonesian electorate's attention now turns to the

nominating process for president. Only nine of the 38 parties

contesting the parliamentary elections qualified for

representation, and only a handful of them will field

presidential candidates. The system will force them into

multiparty coalitions, each representing at least 20 percent of

the seats in the DPR. Even if SBY's Democrat Party ends up with

the 20 percent of seats necessary to nominate him without a

coalition, he will still require a coalition of supporting

parties to compete effectively in July.



SBY would seem to be in the driver's seat for the coming

presidential election. His party finished far ahead of the

others, virtually tripling its 2004 total, and the big

parties—Megawati's PDI-P and Golkar—lost votes. But the

situation is complicated. If PDI-P and Golkar—the second and

third place finishers—manage to come together, SBY would be left

with few choices for a vice presidential partner. He could

preempt that possibility by resurrecting his partnership with

Golkar, either by patching up political affairs with his current

vice president or running with another Golkar candidate (the

sultan of Yogyakarta, for example). He could reach out to PKB

and PAN, but given their declining fortunes, that is unlikely.



The other real prospect for vice president is Hidayat Nur Wahid,

the former president of PKS and the speaker of the joint

assembly and holder of three degrees from University of Medina

in Saudi Arabia. Eight percent may be far below what PKS had

hoped for, but it did hold its own, and it has strong

organizational capacity. Securing a spot a heartbeat away from

the presidency would more than salvage their poor performance in

the parliamentary elections.



The Future of U.S.–Indonesia Relations



SBY has clearly done some things of mutual importance to

Indonesia and the United States. On his watch, Indonesia has

prosecuted the war on terrorism quite effectively: Indonesia is

now going on its fourth year without a major terrorist attack.

Under SBY's leadership, Indonesia is reasserting itself in East

Asian politics, and speaking aloud about the importance of

values in its foreign policy. On this basis—and on the basis of

the positive political model Indonesia serves for other

predominantly Muslim countries—the Obama Administration is

rightly committed to taking the U.S.–Indonesia relationship to a

whole new level of partnership.



On the negative side, SBY has sent mixed signals about an

Islamist agenda diametrically opposed to both Indonesian

tradition and American interest in liberal democratic

governance. The most recent example is the remarkable commission

he offered Shari'a financing at the World Islamic Economic Forum

this past March: "Islamic bankers should therefore do some

missionary work in the Western world to promote the concept of

Shari'a banking, for which many in the West are more than ready

now." While Shari'a financing is a complex subject for another

paper, suffice it to say that most Indonesians in the market are

indifferent to it, and those inclined to examine their options

would find more than enough authoritative religious opinion

approving of interest-based banking services. Plus, Shari'a

financing constitutes a bare 3 percent of the Indonesian market.



No one accuses SBY of being an Islamist. And the DPR election

results are evidence that he is a good political tactician. But

from the perspective of U.S.–Indonesia relations, his political

maneuvering may ultimately bring him into the cross fire of

American politics. Careless statements extolling as a role model

Indonesia's most influential Islamist[1] and calls for Islamist

missions to the West could have the effect of choking off the

tremendous potential in U.S.–Indonesian relations.



A Telling Choice



SBY's election victory should give him the confidence he needs

to develop and assert his own vision for Indonesia. With his

choice of a vice presidential candidate, he will tell the world

something about that vision. There are many factors to consider

in his choice—political calculations top among them—but if SBY

cares about establishing a deeper, mutually beneficial

relationship with the United States, he will consider the way

his choice will be received outside Indonesia. Throwing PKS a

lifeline by giving them the vice presidency will effectively

kill any effort to take the U.S.–Indonesia relationship to the

next level.



Walter Lohman is Director of the Asian Studies Center at The

Heritage Foundation.



[1]Walter Lohman, "Indonesian President's Praise of Natsir

Raises Questions," Heritage Foundation WebMemo No. 2181,

December 31, 2008, at

http://www.heritage .org/Research/ AsiaandthePacifi c/wm2181. cfm

(April 10, 2009).



------------ --------- --------- --------- ---





 

      

    
    
        
         
        
        








        


        
        


      

Kirim email ke