All, This is just a friendly reminder to look into the question Jim Galvin has asked the working group here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/L_TmhBqzzKGDREigZ4NeW7ANzyg
2. To the working group - is there anyone who objects to moving this document forward without an IPR licensing statement? One way or another we need to discuss the IPR disclosure and what to do with it. If there is anybody who needs more information feel free to contact me on- or off mailinglist. Gr, Rik
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
