Miek, > On 30 Aug 2016, at 10:15, Miek Gieben <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also the date on the IPR, lists 2009. Looking at the patent itself the oldest > date there is 2011? > (I have an itchy feeling that by going through previous IETF meetings, we > should > be able to find some prior art, taking 2011 as end date)
Although it is tempting to discuss the patent claim it is irrelevant for the discusion here. The consequence of forwarding without IPR-disclosure is that any implementer will have to interpret the IPR disclosure and the patent claim themselves. And the consequence of the patent or parts of it being granted? I honestly don’t know what Versign will do. They had almost 260 days now to update the IPR statement to clarify that and it has not happened. Scott has indicated multiple times that they are working on it. So if Scott (or anybody else within Verisign) would indicate to the WG when it will update the IPR disclosure that might help to move forward. Gr, Rik _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
