> Em 22 de set de 2016, à(s) 15:56:000, Hollenbeck, Scott 
> <shollenb...@verisign.com> escreveu:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Francisco
>> Arias
>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 2:46 PM
>> To: Andrew Newton
>> Cc: regext@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [regext] FW: Proposal to remove RDAP from the Thick Whois
>> CL&D Policy (was Proposed Path Forward | Thick Whois CL&D Policy, RDAP
>> and RySG Request for Reconsideration)
>> I think there are two parts to your question. First, the Registry
>> Stakeholder Group (RySG) request for reconsideration that triggered
>> this proposal; perhaps someone else in this list (from the RySG) can
>> speak to that.
> Here is the public version of the request:
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/reconsideration-16-10-rysg-request-redacted-09aug16-en.pdf

Just a note that since the publishing of the request the reasoning has been 
updated quite a bit, but that would only be reflected in the public text if the 
RfR actually moves along. So don't take just that as reasons, and consider it 
in the light of other community feedback on this, including many SSAC advices 
on this topic. 


regext mailing list

Reply via email to