FWIW, version 1.0 of the gTLD RDAP profile (i.e., what was requested to be 
implemented) can be found at 


On 9/22/16, 2:40 PM, "Andrew Newton" <a...@hxr.us> wrote:

    That's a fair observation. While I am not sure I reviewed the final
    ICANN profile, I have reviewed in-progress versions. I find it hard to
    believe the ICANN profile evolved to such a point that it makes an
    RDAP implementation commercially infeasible. This simply does not
    sound like a credible argument. If the RySG wishes to stand by this
    point, they should be much more forthcoming with their issues.

regext mailing list

Reply via email to