> Em 22 de set de 2016, à(s) 15:46:000, Francisco Arias 
> <francisco.ar...@icann.org> escreveu:
> I think there are two parts to your question. First, the Registry Stakeholder 
> Group (RySG) request for reconsideration that triggered this proposal; 
> perhaps someone else in this list (from the RySG) can speak to that.
> The second part would be ICANN organization’s proposal to address the RySG 
> request. ICANN is putting for the community’s consideration to do as 
> requested by the RySG and remove the requirement to implement RDAP. We are 
> looking to learn what other members from the community have to say.

Francisco, I think that saying "remove the requirement RDAP at this point with 
this guidance" would better describe what's being asked. RDAP is already a 
contract requirement that can be triggered any time without a policy. 


regext mailing list

Reply via email to