Comments inline. Regards, Gustavo
On 10/5/16, 06:31, "regext on behalf of Peter Koch" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:26:33AM -0400, Marc Blanchet wrote: > >> and might not be organized for technical reference. One idea might be >> to extract the technical stuff from ICANN documents and make it an IETF >> document and then make it normative. A bit more work on IETF side but > >interesting side effect is that change control is with the IETF >afterwards. > >Why exactly does the draft under consideration have to be Standards Track? The idea was to make this document an Standards Track document, because it¹s going to be referenced from another document intended to be Standards Track. After the comments in this email thread, I think that it should be Informational. > >-Peter > >_______________________________________________ >regext mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
