> -----Original Message-----
> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 12:58 AM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-
> object-tag-00.txt
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018, at 15:29, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> > There's been no comment on this document in the month since it was
> > noted on this list. Does anyone have anything to say about the
> > proposed practice?
> I have not specifically commented this version, but all my old comments
> apply to it the same way and the previous thread ended with clear
> positions on both side so I do not think there is anything to rehash.
> In short,
> I am happy if current practice is documented, as such.
> (It would however have been great seeing more support from other RDAP
> server operators)

Agreed, which is why I'm trying to get some discussion going. Folks, if you're 
either running an RDAP service or planning to do so in the future it would be 
very helpful to talk through this proposal.


regext mailing list

Reply via email to