On 3/22/23, 5:44 PM, "regext on behalf of Andrew Newton" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ok. I did find one small issue. Should the draft give explicit mention of returning an HTTP 501 for searches not supported by a server? [JS] Section 1 of RFC 9082 says, "Servers MUST return an HTTP 501 (Not Implemented) [RFC7231] response to inform clients of unsupported query types." If that strictly applies to the query types listed in RFC 9082, then an explicit mention in this draft makes sense. Jasdip _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
