On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 7:57 AM Jasdip Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > What I gather from Andy’s suggestion is that 501 could also be returned for > the reverse search queries that are not implemented (supported) on the server > side. > > That said, your observation of applying HTTP 501 to unsupported request > methods seems right. Not to muddle but wonder if we missed applying HTTP 501 > correctly in RFC 9082?
That is what I meant, but perhaps 405 is the more appropriate response. Kinda annoying that 9082 went through 2 IETF last calls and this wasn't caught. -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
