> -----Original Message----- > From: Maarten Wullink <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 10:06 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] [rpp] RGP (RFC3915) Restore report why? > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > Scott, et al. > > reading the referenced documents i have a hard time finding what the actual > arguments were for the 2 step process. > > would it also not have been possible to do a single restore operation that > contains the report? > the registrar, at the time of restore request, already knows the previous > registration data and the current registration data ( registrant) > > and this is not something ICANN ORG mandates of course, its a result of the > community process. > so updating RGP should also be driven by ICANN community.
[SAH] I don't know what the rationale was, either. We were just stuck with the outcome. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
