+1 Maarten
Thanks, Jody Kolker 319-329-9805 (mobile) Please contact my direct supervisor Scott Courtney ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) with any feedback. This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments. ________________________________ From: Maarten Wullink <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 10:06 AM To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [regext] Re: [rpp] RGP (RFC3915) Restore report why? Scott, et al. reading the referenced documents i have a hard time finding what the actual arguments were for the 2 step process. would it also not have been possible to do a single restore operation that contains the report? the registrar, at ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Scott, et al. reading the referenced documents i have a hard time finding what the actual arguments were for the 2 step process. would it also not have been possible to do a single restore operation that contains the report? the registrar, at the time of restore request, already knows the previous registration data and the current registration data ( registrant) and this is not something ICANN ORG mandates of course, its a result of the community process. so updating RGP should also be driven by ICANN community. - Maarten > Op 4 nov 2025, om 07:10 heeft Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> > het volgende geschreven: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gould, James <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2025 9:35 PM >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: [rpp] RGP (RFC3915) Restore report why? >> >> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click >> links >> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is >> safe. >> >> Jim, >> >> Where in Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Policy Development Process >> does it refer to a two-step restore process? The only reference that we >> found >> was from a meeting on July 7, 2002, with ICANN Redemption Grace Periods for >> Deleted Names Proposal and not embedded in a consensus policy. > > [SAH] Here: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/bucharest/redemption-topic.htm__;!!Hj18uoVe_Lnx!uTzgn7ribetU08gSty3Rcqije4ADRpqZZIC1G_UlYjZP_sVHqogtvEtOoiOOvY8dxMYDmI5peILxkO33uSfiZtWaEiDiig8w$ > > and here: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20030323.DeletesTF-final-report.html__;!!Hj18uoVe_Lnx!uTzgn7ribetU08gSty3Rcqije4ADRpqZZIC1G_UlYjZP_sVHqogtvEtOoiOOvY8dxMYDmI5peILxkO33uSfiZtWaEv6Chxmx$ > > Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
