Hi Scott, > On 6 Nov 2025, at 12:43, Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> [snip] >> Perhaps we could stop using urn:ietf: URIs in Internet-Drafts. This is >> something I >> suggested in Madrid: > > [SAH] Thanks for the reminder. That practice might help.
I just noticed that RFC 3735 says this: 2.2.1. Standards Track Extensions URIs for extensions intended for IETF standards track use MUST conform to the URN syntax specifications and registration procedures described in [RFC 3688]. I don't believe an Informational RFC can bind the authors of an Internet-Draft. A standards-track I-D can use any URI, and then switch to an IETF URN at the point when it is published as an RFC. But I think draft-ietf-regext-ext-registry-epp may want to say so, with reference to the above. G. -- Gavin Brown Principal Engineer, Global Domains & Strategy Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) https://www.icann.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
