I see your point. What if "shall be grounded in operational experience from at least two independent deployments and" is removed?
Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Newton <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 6:35 PM > To: Scott Hollenbeck <[email protected]>; 'Mario Loffredo' > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [regext] Re: RECHARTERING of REGEXT > > Does the last sentence set too high of a bar? Because I don't think RFC9874 > would have been in charter if that had been in affect. Not that I disagree > with > the general direction of basing docs on real-world experience, but I also > think > something like RFC9874 would be necessary to do regardless. > > Also, I don't know how to relate "deployments" to RDAP clients. Does this > preclude the group writing BCPs on RDAP clients? > > -andy, as an individual > > On 5/27/26 7:23 AM, Scott Hollenbeck wrote: > > I like Mario’s suggestion. Such documents aren’t extensions, but they’re > directly related to operating EPP and RDAP. +1 with that text included. > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > *From:*Mario Loffredo <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Monday, May 25, 2026 11:53 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* [regext] Re: RECHARTERING of REGEXT > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I have some doubts about the sentence "This includes, *but is not limited > to:*". > > > > On the one hand, it leaves room for the adoption of documents that > address topics not mentioned in the charter, but which are then deemed > relevant by working group members. > > > > On the other hand, a loosely defined scope could lead to big discussions > about documents that address topics that some members consider out-of- > scope, while others do not. Such discussions have sometimes stalled the > WG's activity and the document development process for months. > > > > Honestly, I can't decide what is best. :-( > > > > In any case, I would add the following to the bulleted list in the "Scope of > Work" section: > > > > "/Best practices for the deployment and operation of EPP and RDAP, > including recommendations for security, scalability, and interoperability. > Such documents shall be grounded in operational experience from at least > two independent deployments and may be published on the Informational or > BCP track as appropriate./" > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Mario > > > > > > > > > > > > Il 22/05/2026 16:30, James Galvin ha scritto: > > > > This message begins a two week period for the Working Group to review a > proposed new charter. > > > > > > > > As you know, we have both a new Area and a new Area Director for our > working group as of IETF125. Mohamed Boucadair has previously > introduced himself and our new area: Operations and Management Area > (ops). > > > > > > > > As part of this move it is being proposed to update our charter. After > reviewing the work we have been doing and looking forward to work that may > come our way, as well as alignment with our new area, on behalf of the IESG > Med is proposing the following charter for our consideration: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/IETF-OPS-AD/Charters/blob/main/regext.md > <https://github.com/IETF-OPS-AD/Charters/blob/main/regext.md> > > > > > > > > The goal is to have this revised charter in place before IETF126. We > > have > a pretty tight schedule in order to achieve this, which looks like this: > > > > > > > > - 22/05: Begin WG Review of Proposed Charter > > > > - 05/06: Consolidate the final version to place in the IESG Telechat > > of > 2026-06-18 > > > > - 18/06: IESG internal review + release required revisions to address > IESG comments > > > > — * IETF Community review > > > > - 02/07: IESG final review > > > > > > > > Our working group review begins now and will be open for 2 weeks, until > Friday, 5 June. > > > > > > > > Please review this proposed charter and bring any questions or > comments you have to the mailing list. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your prompt review and consideration! > > > > > > > > Antoin, Jorge, and Jim > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > regext mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] <mailto:regext- > [email protected]> > > > > -- > > > > Dott. Mario Loffredo > > > > Senior Technologist > > > > Technological Unit “Digital Innovation” > > > > Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) > > > > National Research Council (CNR) > > > > Address: Via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy > > > > Phone: +39.0503153497 > > > > Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo > <http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > regext mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
