Maybe you could but some query/response examples in your draft of how a client is suppose to handle backwards incompatibility.... both for a client that supports this versioning extension and one that does not. That would probably help demystify this for those of us in disagreement.
-andy, no hats On 09-06-2026 10:07 AM, Gould, James wrote:
Andy, It's not a requirement for the client to use the /help to get additional versioning data, but a feature that a client can opt to use. The extension identifier is not a good versioning signal and leveraging the extensibility of RDAP to provide that versioning information is an option and not a mandate for interoperability. We could add additional opaque versioning information to the /help, such as opaque version relationships, to further help with those extensions that choose to use opaque versioning instead of point versioning. Do you see a benefit in working on this? This meta-data is not required but helpful to client implementations and for troubleshooting. Thanks,
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
