ok :) Have a nice day
2013/5/29 Ken Vermette <[email protected]> > Sorry it to me long to get back, too. I never got your reply and this kind > of got lost in the shuffle. > > Re-looking it over, I agree wholeheartedly. I'll take another swing at it > and aim for a more simplified version that keep with the current layout of > the icon. Looking at what I sent it does feel both overcomplicated and flat > at the same time. No time guarantees on any work, but consider it in the > pipes again. > > Sorry for the improper quote. > - Ken > > >> Hi Ken, > >> and sorry for the VERY LATE reply. I took a look to your work, I thought > >> about, I took my time... and I think that rekonq icon is Lionel's one. > Let > >> me please explain this. > >> In our early days, we had an easy icon done by a child (one of rekonq > first > >> supporters). Then Lionel started thinking about implementing a new one. > He > >> thought a lot about and we discuss a lot of times: the world, the blue, > the > >> dragon with red eyes embracing it and so on. > >> Given this, you are allowed and I am personally very happy about someone > >> working on the icon. But I think the dragon should stay in the position > it > >> is in Lionel's one. Main target of a new icon should be rewamp and > >> simplificate it. > >> Hope I clarified my opinion about. > >> > >> Regards, > > _______________________________________________ > rekonq mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq > > -- Andrea Diamantini WEB: http://www.adjam.org rekonq project WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org IRC: rekonq@freenode
_______________________________________________ rekonq mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
