Interesting (as well as your analysis in the previous messages). All my values and errors (NOE, R1 and R2) are consistent between 2 software packages, but I might want to consider alternative error sampling if the end results are suspicious. Anyways, something tells me there's still going to be a few more kinks to work out before I get my first parameter data table :p
I'll update the minfx build and start the calculations up again. Thanks a lot, Tyler Quoting Edward d'Auvergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Right, I've fixed the bug in the minfx repository. It will take me a > while to release minfx 1.0.2 but using subversion you can get the > changes immediately. Note that as this space is so warped, > optimisation of this model will take a long, long time! > > Regards, > > Edward > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Edward d Auvergne > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Update of bug #12499 (project relax): >> >> Status: Confirmed => Fixed >> Open/Closed: Open => Closed >> >> _______________________________________________________ >> >> Follow-up Comment #5: >> >> This problem has been fixed in the minfx project >> (https://gna.org/projects/minfx/), in the bug report >> https://gna.org/bugs/?12501. >> >> _______________________________________________________ >> >> Reply to this item at: >> >> <http://gna.org/bugs/?12499> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Message sent via/by Gna! >> http://gna.org/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
