Hi Edward, > For dimers, unfortunately I don't have much advice I can give. The > only person who could we be the one who derives the correct > theoretical treatment of dimers in the future. You may have avoided > the issue though if you have a perfectly symmetrical dimer.
OK > It won't give much, but the bond vectors orientations are different > between two monomers. The superimposition is not perfect. But, as we > have discussed before on the list, it will not do anything for the > theoretical problem, if you indeed do have a problem. It will only > show you any small bond vector orientation artefacts. OK > I am also unaware of any theoretical treatment. If you deposit your > dynamics data for your publication in the BMRB, via the relax export > functions, then this might open a door to allow a theoretician in the > future to use real data for solving this problem. we will do so > As for solving the > problem now and you are 100% sure that this is not already solved, > unless you would like to dive into quite complex theory, then there is > nothing we can do. You could make a 1 line comment about the > deficiency in the manuscript, and make the statement that this is an > unsolved problem. we will do so > Anyway, the perfect symmetry might mean that the diffusion tensor as > seen in the reference frame of each monomer is identical, so that the > bond vectors in each experience the same 5 global correlation times > and hence the standard analysis will work perfectly. If so, no > special theory is required. OK got it. Thanks, Stefano _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-users mailing list relax-users@gna.org To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
