Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 16:53 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > My gut feeling was that I'd want .92 back but I have now looked at the
> > schedule and it makes sense to have .5 after GUADEC, and I wouldn't
> > want to squeeze too many releases after that.
> >
> > Effectively I'm not sure decoupling the freeze would work effectively,
> > I would keept it paired to .90.
>
> Bleh, I guess we should finalize this really soon now.
>
> Though it would mean 4 weeks of no release around GUADEC, I propose to
> * drop 3.13.5 and introduce 3.13.92
> * w21 Aug18 3.13.90 The Freeze
> * w23 Sep01 3.13.91 String Freeze
> * w25 Sep15 3.13.92 Hardcode Freeze
Works for me.
> Need to edit releng/tree/tools/schedule/3.14.schedule in Git once I'm
> back on a machine with my SSH key; anybody feel free to be faster.
Done (but I didn't generated the .ics file).
Fred
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.
